SELF-UNKNOWING MAKES ONE MEAN
Ones Real Self provides Spiritual Elements type Wisdom which imparts a real Self-Identity. But a False Self “Clouds” over ones birth-gift “Soul Sunshine,” causing one to lose contact with who one is as a human. That philosophically puts one outside the Natural Cosmos + establishes a Self-Unknowing + causes a loss of courage and the “5Ss” (which only comes from having a true sense of Selfhood Greatness). Resultant self-doubt automatically places boundaries on ones own Self-Trust in times of threats, disturbances, or destructions. Not knowing who one is disconnects one from all there is in ones environment and in the Cosmos—a disconnection making for a “me vs. everything else” mindset—a mindset of overflowing Hate-full-ness. Such Supernatural mindsets that now think “Inside-Out” see no alternative but to be aggressive against “everything else” before “everything else” can push me around.” For example, if “Black” is “everything else,” then I must fight “Black” and win before “Black” attacks me. By Self-Unknowing also being rooted in an occult mythological context, all of this is serious business and for which there is no time to relax from “war” and have fun. Because an “Inside-Out” mindset operates out of a fantasy “Air Castle,” it fashions Delusions (believing what is not real and not believing what is real). Thus, all of its thinking patterns are confused, in conflict, and follow no order. To get through life they fashion “Simultaneous opposites” to live by—meaning hypocrisy seems natural, even if one contradicts oneself in the same breath—as done by politicians.
They can only extend guarded trust to like-kind people who do not like each other. This dates to ancient Aryans who would fight each other to pass the time of day. But they immediately stopped and joined forces to attack and rob the rich or to prevent losses of ill-gotten gains (those stolen from others). Together, they create in their own image a Contingent god who embodies their beliefs. So as to have some semblance of order, they all act in conformity to their cult. Hence, these “Individualists” are always in the dilemma of having to act out of conformity—a situation calling for partial trust in ones cult members and the cult’s doctrines—but staying suspicious of both. Such is exhibited by all of today’s Republicans voting to repeal the law of Obamacare—and doing it 60+ times—and with no power to change this law. They give up all independent thought so as to blend into each other’s ways of think, feel, say, and do expressions, for these unhappy people are all they have. Their power is exerted, not by personal power, but rather by the GUN. This is the composition of the hypocritical state of each saying: “I am my own man”!!! Such “Inside-Out” thinking is simplified by all cult members seeing things in definite “Either/Or” and “All-or-None” terms; simultaneously “oppose/favor not just one but all”; believing there is no “Right” way other than what they think, feel, say, and do. From being mad with life’s history as well as hating themselves and “everyone else”, their presumed remedy is to select an enemy and destroy it so as to get momentary relief from causing misery to others. Many Europeans look at dark-skinned people and their achievements with extreme envy. Then they engage in Reaction Formation—the converting of something extremely desired but wholly unattainable into something discredited and despised. The world’s top tennis player, Serena Williams, always receives a barrage of hateful insults.
That Envy Insults are a pattern of Self-Unknowing people is illustrated by the Italian Vespucci (1451-1512) who gave his name of Amerigo to the New World as America. He borrowed labels of Jews as the ultimate racist metaphor for greed, cunning, super-human sexual powers, and malevolent Christ-killer. He then assigned such labels—e.g. savages, infidels, and cannibals–to Amerindians and Africans, including the cultured Moors in Spain and Portugal. Europeans (e.g. Freyre) who wrote/write about slavery in romantic and racist statements but disguised as liberal and enlightened scholarship have typically and stupidly implied: (1) Enslaved Africans took to slavery “like birds take to the air”; (2) the Enslaved were happy because they kept their music, dance, and song alive; and (3) they could be civilized by whips, chains, and forced labor and racism. To expose such “Inside-Out” thinking, Frobenius (1550) said: “Africans and Mexican Indians were civilized to the marrow of their bones—the idea of the barbaric Negro is a European invention.” jabaileymd.com